Skip to content
  • Services
  • Methodology
  • About
  • Contact
  • Discourse Notes
  • Before You Approve the Wording

    What corporate language does to events, products, and responsibility Sometimes your job comes down to choosing…

  • Before the Answer: Questions Are Never Neutral

    How forensic linguistic analysis can reveal the assumptions built into legal and institutional questioning In legal…

  • Sorry, I’m Canadian

    Politeness, identity, and apology legislation in Canada In Canada, “sorry” often appears where no obvious fault…

  • Who Speaks in AI Writing?

    Something that worries those of us who study discourse and language, especially now, as AI becomes…

  • When Language Assumes Too Much

    A short story about AI, refugee claims, and linguistic profiling I was looking for a case.…

  • What Makes Chávez and Trump the Same?

    Displacement, Scaling, and the Sacralization of Political Authority There is nothing unusual about the moralization of…

  • Is a Tomato a Fruit?

    Nix v. Hedden, 149 U.S. 304 (1893) Some legal questions are easy to mock. They arrive…

  • A Protocol for the Representation of Proper Names and Toponyms in Multilingual Forensic Contexts

    In multilingual investigations, proper names are rarely stable. They appear with variation, omission, transliteration, and adaptation.…

  • What Is the Difference Between CDA and Forensic Discourse Analysis?

    It is a reasonable question. If both Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) and Forensic Discourse Analysis (FDA)…

  • “Give Me a Lawyer, Dog”: A Case of Linguistic Ambiguity

    How a spoken utterance became a legal problem—and what it reveals about meaning in institutional contexts…

Next Page→
Loading Comments...